2008 Best Practices Database
2008 Practices
Award Winners
Best Practices
Good Practices
Shortlisted Practices
Promising Practices
Search Database

Practice in detail

Click here to view list of all practices

ACTIVE ORCASITAS: CIVIC AGREEMENT
Classification: Good Practice
City / Town / Village: Madrid
Country: Spain
Region: Europe
Name of Contact Person: Eloy Cuellar Martín
Address:
Orcasitas Neighbours’ Association
Street, Pza. de la Asociación s/nº
P.O. Box, 28041
City/Town, Postal Code, Madrid
Country, Spain
Telephone (Country code) (City code) number, 91 3415318
Fax (Country code) (City code) number, 91 3415318
Email addresses. activa@orcasitas.net
Of contact person,:www.orcasitas.net (→Orcasitas Forum →Orcasitas Active Project)


4. Type of Organisation: choose from the following:

• Base organisations: Orcasitas Neighbours’ Association (Impulsa)
• Network: Orcasitas Forum (participating
Type of Organisation: Local Authority
Categories of Practice
Architecture and Urban Design
Urban Governance
Urban and Regional Planning
Summary:

The Orcasitas Participation Model, which has been under way since the 1970s, has its latest milepost in the innovative Orcasitas Active Project, which has generated favourable dynamics for the integral development of the district, affecting both social and town planning aspects and supplying an innovative method for public participation linking three basic factors, citizenship, public space and city model.

The project’s first impact is the renovation of the traditional district association with the creation of the Orcasitas Forum. An ambit that served to drive the project and that currently continues its activity containing all the social organisations in the district (from the neighbours’ association to the football team and even the parish) which provide the synergy needed for local development.

The Orcasitas Forum provided the neighbours with a public consultancy to collect their demands and proposals. Over 1000 neighbours participate (almost 100% of the heads of family), giving rise to a series of initiatives which, organised and prioritised in later meetings with experts and thematic discussions, form the District Development Strategic Plan, which is being implemented with the supervision of the Orcasitas Forum and that includes actions in housing, employment, education, ecology, equipment, etc.

Throughout this process, the neighbours individually signed a Civic Agreement that contains the inhabitants’ commitments to their own district. Through the Orcasitas Agreement, the neighbours have adopted a commitment in matters of civic affairs, participation, neighbourliness, solidarity and ecology. A measure that is greatly contributing to neighbourliness in the district, preventing conflicts in many areas.

The project has been an innovation in the setting up of public participation and creating a city, revitalising the tradition of participation in Orcasitas and strengthening the position of this district of Madrid in the metropolitan area. The Orcasitas model has been recognised by many institutions - universities and even the Prime Minister’s office and the Royal Household, etc.

Key Dates:

1971: Legalisation of the Orcasitas Neighbours’ Association (start of the adventure for the district of Orcasitas).
1972: Building by the neighbours of the premises for the Neighbours’ Association.
1973: Sentence from the Supreme Court known as “binding report”.
1986: Inauguration of the district (end of remodelling process).
1994: Visit of the King and Queen of Spain to Orcasitas; crisis of the association movement
2004: Constitution of the Orcasistas Forum.
2005: Active Orcasitas: public consultation for the district’s strategic plan and signing of the Orcasitas Agreement.
2007: Start of the Ecobarrio project

Narrative:

SITUATION BEFORE THE INITIATIVE BEGAN

Participation’ is the name of a street in Orcasitas because perhaps this is one of the places in which this word has been made most real since from the 1970s this district has undergone an intense remodelling process with the focus on democratic public participation, later consolidated as a model for creating a city.

However, the 1990s were years of retreat for social movements in general and in Orcasitas, although to a lesser extent. There was also a certain relaxation in the neighbourhood, for various reasons: individualism, the famous ideological crisis, the scarce adaptation to the new times by those who were once innovators and, above all, the invasion of society by a policy that reduced participation to the right to vote every four years. The lack of the districts’ influence on the model of the city has in turn been the cause and consequence of all this. This is when the traditional identity as a “working class district” and its implication of community links disappeared. For all of this it was necessary to recover self-esteem and launch new proposals.

ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIORITIES

The main priorities of Active Orcasitas were:

  1. To reinforce the district’s identity. A new “district debate at the root of the project” occurred.
  2. Tangible objectives in the form of urban, social, educational and environmental improvements proposed by the neighbours in public consultation. Some of these have already been carried out.
  3. The setting up of a framework for better neighbourliness in the district, the Orcasitas Agreement.
  4. Modernisation of the association’s premises and incorporation of the dynamics of networks for the information society.
  5. Self-knowledge as a district. The public consultation served to show the neighbours’ needs and expectations.

FORMULATION OF OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES

Objectives

Strategy

- Contribute to the local and democratic development of the district.

- Public consultation and strategic plan.

- Revitalise the district association.

- Enlivenment of Orcasitas Forum (network of associations).

- Recover the social pulse of Orcasitas

- Impulse of a community project.

- Contribute to the integration of immigrants and ethnic minorities in the district.

- Civic Agreement and its development and implementation in education.

- Incorporation of new methods for public participation.

- Active Orcasitas: method in three phases.

- Impulse to districts’ participation in the model of the city.

- Declaration for the districts. Impulse for district associations.

- Sustainability

- Creation of the environmental committee and impulse for heating community. Inclusion of ecology section in the Orcasitas Agreement. Start of energy saving measures in the district.

MOBILISATION OF RESOURCES

The project’s support structure was:

Orcasitas Neighbours’ Association: Responsible for promoting the initiative and launching the idea and also the organisation to request a grant from Madrid City Council to facilitate the project’s financial resources. Madrid City Council provided a grant of €18,000 for the start of the project which became self-financing after the first year by the association itself.

Orcasitas Forum: Network of organisations that deposited and owned the project. The organisation monitors its progress and defines priorities, objectives and schedules. The Orcasitas Forum consists of the following organisations:

  • L’Orcasitas Teatro.
  • Asociación de Mujeres Meseta de Orcasitas.
  • Parroquia de la Preciosa Sangre.
  • Orcasitas Solidaria.
  • A.VV. Orcasitas.
  • Revista Orcasitas.
  • Agrupación Deportiva Orcasitas.
  • Mancomunidad de calefacción de Orcasitas.
  • Foundation Iniciativas Sur.
  • Asociación Juvenil de Orcasitas.

Active Orcasitas office

Consisting of four technicians who animate the project according to the neighbours’ needs:

  • Eloy Cuellar Martín: Coordinador del Orcasitas Active Project
  • Carlos Sánchez Santos: Técnico
  • Francisco Rosa Novalbos: Técnico
  • Juan Antonio Cachinero Fuentes: Técnico de Diseño y maquetación.

Equipo de Apoyo a la Oficina Técnica (Voluntarios)

  • Iván Pascual Fernández.
  • Marta López-Rey González.
  • Ainoa Santos Luna.
  • Miguel Peral París.
  • José Manuel Penabella Calero.
  • Diana Santos Luna.
  • Almudena Cerezo Ibáñez.
  • Gema Aguirre López Rey
  • Purificación López Ortiz
  • Dolores García Pizarro
  • Isabel Contreras. (Coordinación Área Educación)
  • Santiago Anes Benito. (Coordinación Área Vivienda)
  • Mª Antonia García-Heras Sánchez
  • Natividad Fernández
  • Juan Eugenio Mora

Technical office support team (Iniciativas Sur Foundation)

  • Francisco Palomera Camarero. (Coordinación Formación y Empleo)
  • Juan Cordero Recuero. (Coordinación Ecología)
  • Luis Fernández ( Apoyo Formación)

Participating and supportive intellectuals

  • Carlos Berzosa.
  • Manuel Castells
  • José Manuel Bringas
  •  Javier Vega
  • Jesús Gago
  • Eugenio del Río
  • José de la Paz
  • Miguel A. de la Prada
  • Jesús Leal
  • Antonio Antón ( Apoyo Mesa de Empleo)
  • Pedro Casas (Apoyo Mesa de Educación)
  • Rafael Feito
  • Blanca Moltó
  • Javier Burón

Special mention throughout the process

  • Félix López-Rey (historical neighbourhood leader in Orcasitas)

District general assembly (the main decision-taking organisation)

PROCESS

The Orcasitas participation model started in the 1970s and is based on direct democracy. The following describes the steps taken based opn the expericne of Active Orcasitas, which summarises the form of creating a city as undergone by this district of Madrid.

\At the end of 2004, the Orcasitas magazine, distributed free and very popular with the residents of this district, included a leafet inside with the headline, “Three steps to achieve a better district.” It was the announcement of the Orcasitas Active Project through a document that encouraged neighbours to reactivate the district once more.

The proposal, from the Orcasitas Forum, issued a challenge: achieve the massive participation of neighbours in the context of a very intensive process to recover the pulse of the district and at the same time to define the Orcasitas of the 21st century.

The leaflet, which summarised the project very graphically, specified three steps, tegether with their dates:

Public consultation: To know the neighbours’ proposals. Perhaps the first step would be the most difficult in the project.

For Active Orcasitas this was a test which would define the viability of the next steps. The initial work was carried out with great effort by many of those involved. More than 7000 documents of the civic agreement and the consultation were distributed through letterboxes, innumerable posters were put up and more than 15 presentations made explaining the project. The objective, described in a meeting of the Orcasitas Forum, consisted in achieving more than 1000 signed commitments.

The response was a formidable, in only  three conferences which together totalled no more than 10 hours, despite the January cold, more than 1100 persons signed their undertaking with names and surnames with Orcasitas and rose to the challenge.

Participation conference: To prioritise the proposals and order them among all in a strategic plan for the district.

The next step consisted of preparing a document describing the district’s situation as a social diagnosis. Based on this document, a conference was held on 12 March which had two moments, the first with technicians and experts making up the thematic meetings according to the priorities based on the consultation: housing, employment, education and ecology.

Each meeting was co-ordinated by an expert in the matter accompanied by persons from the Orcasitas Forum. They were given a project files to collect all the solutions proposed in the sessions.

They worked, discussed and gave their best. They found it difficult to reach agreements but, finally, each meeting proposed five possible solutions. They were asked for specific, practical proposals for the district.

There was something of everything, some more specific and some more generic, but all of them laden with the future. This moment ended with the signing of the Madrid Districts Declaration in which numerous associations joined and the purpose of which was to contribute to bringing the districts out of the invisibility in which they were immersed, reclaiming their inclusion in the city’s projects.

The second moment was the presentation of the solutions to the neighbours for the most interesting proposals and solutions to be prioritised by voting, in which there was mass participation.

Signing of the Civic Agreement: The results we used to prepare a strategic plan, described in the publication of Orcasitas. First public agreement.

The Orcasitas agreement is the first civic agreement in Spain promoted by social organisations. It was signed between 27 and 29 January, 2005 by 1126 neighbours of Orcasitas.

                       

RESULTS ACHIEVED

Results

Ámbit

Strategic plan for Orcasitas

Improved living conditions for persons and local development.

Constitution and stable functioning of the Orcasitas Forum

Changes in the decision taking processes including the institutionalising of the associations, revitalising of the district associations.

Public consultation

 

Recovery of the social pulse in Orcasitas

Contribution to the integration of immigrants and ethnic minorities in the district

Changes in the population’s conduct and attitudes.

Incorporation of new public participation methods

Improved co-ordination and integration among those involved, organisations and institutions. The project has been taken as a reference in many ambits. The project book was distributed to neighbourhood associations in Spain and presented in many conferences.

Interaction with various institutional/base mechanisms for initiatives in the districts.

Impulse to the participation of districts in the model of the city. Improved institutional capacity at national, regional and local levels.

Ecology and environmental committee. Management of the heating community among all the groups in the Orcasitas Forum. Incorporation of solar panels in the heating centre. Distribution of thousands of low consumption bulbs among the neighbours of Orcasitas to achieve a considerable saving of CO2 in the district.

Incorporation of the discussion on sustainability. Changes in national and regional policies and strategies at the social, economic and environmental levels.

Preparation of a new discussion as a district: “vulnerable districts”

 

Recognition and identification of opportunities and specific limitations.

Renewal of installations, modernisation of infrastructures, repair of buildings, changes in the use of land for neighbourhood initiative and incorporation of new equipment and urban furniture proposed by the neighbours.

 

 

Changes in the use and assignation of human, technical and financial resources at local and national levels.

Orcasitas Voltage Project: Conversion of the old high voltage pylons into artistic elements, “Animated structure” designed by the neighbours.

Collaboration with Intermediae

programme.

SUSTAINABILITY

Financial: The project started from a neighbourhood initiative and was driven thanks to a grant from the Public Participation Department of Madrid City Council with an initial aid of €18,000. Despite the success of the neighbourhood participation in the project (easily exceeding the Agenda 21 institutional initiative), this help was not maintained over time and the neighbours had to pay the upkeep of the technical office. This support was carried out thanks to the volunteers and the only costs were for material.

Social and economic: The Orcasitas Agreement gave rise to numerous initiatives to promote gender equality such as the preparation of materials for infants containing the values of the declaration made by the neighbours, paid for by the Orcasitas Forum education committee. The Orcasitas Women’s Association prepared a film on the contribution of women in the process of remodelling the district.

Cultural: The Intermediae project, which arose as a result of the Active Orcasitas initiative, is converting the old high voltage pylons that cross the district into an animated structure.

Environmental: Setting up of solar panels in the heating centre, participation of Orcasitas Forum in the “Day of the Earth,” preparation of materials in the Orcasitas magazine paid for by the Environmental Committee. Initiative to distribute low consumption bulbs to the neighbours and individual checking of consumption.

Institutional: Except for the financing of the initial phase of the project, this initiative has been undertaken without any institutional support.

LESSONS LEARNED

Strong points:

The first lesson learnt is that any initiative in the area of public participation must be focused on those aspects that are fundamental for people’s daily lives (housing, employment, transport, quality of life) to which transverse aspects are incorporated (sustainability, education, values, culture, identity, etc), the participation being a transverse vehicle and not an end in itself.

Another aspect concerns communication. In Active Orcasitas the messages were easily understood by the public. It is necessary to make an effort to avoid technical terms and appeal to referential frameworks to reach the majority.

The most important aspect concerns intensity. Proposals were made to the public featuring a limited duration with a planned start and end. Routes were set up with an extremely clear high point (the three steps) and defined objectives, the specific results being checked within a short time.

The method can contribute to structure vulnerable districts since it represents an opportunity for dialogue with the community. In this sense, the project is very exportable.

Areas for improvement: The fulfilment of the initiatives presented by the neighbours depends on the later negotiations with the institutions, which introduces a factor of uncertainty in the process.

Voluntary work is not sufficient to undertake the project so a “technical office” is necessary; this dedicates much effort to dynamising and impelling the actions. The problem with this is that it is possible to die from success if the technical office cannot respond to all the proposals from those involved.

The implementation of the method implies an “emotional rise” for the district that must then be managed, especially remembering that government departments show interest only when the initiative is present in the communications media.

TRANSFERS

The practice can be replicated easily since there is a clear and simple method that can be applied in different communities, taking into account the cultural elements and features. There is a publication that explains the entire method used, in which technical aspects can be consulted to carry out the three fundamental steps described.

The practice has been chosen by the Regional Federation of Neighbours’ Associations of Madrid (FRAVM) as a reference model for the associations in Madrid. It has also been used by the Carlos III University as a practice for local politics students in matters of public participation. The practice has also been described in numerous conferences including in the Volunteers’ School in the region of Madrid. Numerous associations, councils and neighbourhood groups have requested information about Active Orcasitas.

References:

Publications

Orcasitas. Primer Pacto Ciudadano. Editado por la A.V. de Orcasitas en  2005. Eloy Cuellar, Juan Antonio Cachinero y Carlos Sánchez.

Administración Inteligente: Autores: Antonio Díaz Méndez y Eloy Cuellar Martín. Editorial Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas. (Referencia al proyecto).2007

Some articles published in newspapers

Ø      Titulo del Articulo:Orcasitas haciendo arte del enemigo

Ø      Fuente: Diario ADN 12 de Abril de 2007. Almudena Zazo

Ø      Titulo del Articulo: Los ciudadanos exigen participar en el urbanismo

Ø      Fuente: Diario EL MUNDO /6 de Mayo de 2005. José María Olmo

Ø      Titulo del Articulo: Orcasitas otra vez en la lucha vecinal

Ø      Fuente: Diario EL PAIS /27 de Marzo de 2005. Rafael Fraguas

Ø      Titulo del Articulo: El Foro de Orcasitas pide a los políticos que se comprometan con el barrio

Ø      Fuente: Diario EL PAIS 2 de Marzo de 2005. Servimedia.

Ø      Titulo del Articulo:Orcasitas logra un Pacto político para mejorar el barrio

Ø      Fuente: Diario ABC /3 de Marzo de 2005. Sara Medialdea.

Ø      Titulo del Articulo:El renacer de la participación

Ø      Fuente:  José Luis Fernandez y Alfredo Ramos. Periódico Diagonal. Junio de 2005

Ø      Titulo del Articulo: El renacer de la participación

Ø      Fuente: Gaceta Vecinal. Mayo 2005 Editada por la FRAVM (Federación Regional de Asociaciones de Vecinos de Madrid).

Ø      Titulo del Articulo: Vecinos de Orcasitas piden que se escuche más a los barrios.

Ø      Fuente: Diario 20minutos. 11 de Marzo de 2005. Redacción

Others

Numerous references and information have appeared in local newspapers and specialised magazines as well as radio stations (SER, Onda Madrid and Cope) and TV stations (RTVE, Localia, Telemadrid). Special mention must be made of the repercussion of the initiative on the Internet.

 

Other Contact Information


Nominating Organisation:
Comité Hábitat Español

Name of Contact Person: José Luis Nicolás Rodrigo
Address:
Ministry of Housing
Street: Paseo de la Castellana, 112
Post code: 28046
City: Madrid
Province: Madrid
Country: Spain
Telephone number:+34 91 728 4091
Fax: +34 91 728 4862
E-mail: concursobbpp@vivienda.es
Web site: www.vivienda.es

Type of Organisation: Private Sector

Partner 1:
Foundation Iniciativas Sur

Name of Contact Person: Francisco Palomera
Address:
Street: Pza. de la Asociación nº 1
Post code: 28041
City: Madrid
Province: Madrid
Country: Spain
Telephone number: +34 91 3412698
Fax: 91 3415342
E-mail: fundacionini@telefonica.net
web site: www.murciasalud.es

Type of Organisation: Foundation

Type of Support: Technical Support

Partner 2:
Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Servicio de Fomento del Asociacionismo)


Name of Contact Person: Víctor García

Address:
Street: C/ Bailen nº 41
Post code: 28005
City: Madrid
Province: Madrid
Country: Spain
Telephone number:
Fax:
E-mail:
web site: www.munimadrid.es

Type of Organisation: Local Authority

Type of Support: Financial Support
Related Policies:

There has been no institutional support. The Madrid City Council provided a grant for the start of the project within the framework of grants for public participation but later it took no further part in it. It has been driven at all times by the neighbours of Orcasitas with the support of intellectuals and artists.

The initiative has influenced the development of Agenda 21 in Madrid and other plans for public participation in Spain. The Orcasitas model has given rise to innumerable legal changes (modification of ministerial partial plans, town planning plans and some laws, especially the so-called “binding report” defended by Eduardo García de Enterría.

The European Parliament Committee on Petitions is analysing the project at this time.

 

 


Report any errors to web administrator
BLP 2008