Citizen-Led Integration and Coordination: Transferring the Lessons from Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, Canada

Report

Day / Time Monday, June 19th / 14:00 - 16:00


Event Description

A brief case study will be presented on the implementation of the Pleasant Hill Local Area Plan and its attempt at empowering citizens through knowledge transfer to lead the call for an intersectoral approach to improving policy, program, and service delivery coordination. There will be particular emphasis on the challenges of engaging indigenous peoples and organizations within an intersectoral framework. We will further demonstrate the applicability of this framework within a developing country (e.g. The Case of Gonzales, Port of Spain, Trinidad ). Using focused conversation, participants will be asked to consider their own approach and experiences with citizen-lead calls for intersectoral collaboration. Time will be allocated to developing individual and connective action plans to improve public engagement in implementing coordinated policy, program and service delivery models.


Session Language

English

French


Speakers

Lorne Sully, MCIP, Manager of City Planning, City of Saskatoon, Canada

Livia Kellett, MCIP, Local Area Planner, City of Saskatoon, Canada

Kelley Moore, MCIP, Regional Intersectoral Committee Coordinator, Saskatchewan Learning, Canada

Carol Bruce, Pleasant Hill Local Area Planning Committee, Saskatoon, Canada Winifred David, Acting City Deputy Clerk, City of Port of Spain, Trinidad Rev. Dr. Jason Gordon, Community of Gonzales Representative, Port of Spain, Trinidad Deborah Thomas, Managing Director, East Port-of-Spain Development Company Limited, Trinidad and Tobago


Host Organization
City of Saskatoon, Community of Pleasant Hill, Province of Saskatchewan, City of Port of Spain, Community of Gonzales and East Port of Spain Development Company LTD


Host Organization Description
The City of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, is a municipal government that works toward an enhanced quality of life, vibrant economy, responsible, progressive environmental management, continued river valley stewardship, recognition of the diversity of neighbourhoods while promoting a united community, planned growth and regional and global opportunities. Information regarding the other partners will be available at the networking session due to space requirements.


Website

www.saskatoon.ca/org/city_planning/local_area_plans/index.asp

www.cip-icu.ca


Report

back to top

Title of Event:


Name of Organisations:


Date and time of the session:

 

Citizen-Led Integration and Coordination: Transferring the Lessons from Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, Canada

City of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Learning, Community of Pleasant Hill, City of Port of Spain, Community of Gonzales and Port of Spain Development Company Limited

Monday, June 19, 2006, 14:00 - 16:00

Key Highlights

  1. Estimated no of participants: 70
  2. Stakeholder group representation at the event: Community Representatives, NGO's, Local Authority, Government
  3. What were the expected objectives:
  • Share our experiences in citizen engagement in comprehensive planning;
  • Reflect on different approaches and experiences with citizen-led calls for intersectoral collaboration;
  • Assess the strengths and challenges of citizen-led calls for intersectoral collaboration; and
  • Outline individual and team action plans to improve public engagement in implementing plans.
  1. What did the networking event achieve:
  • Learned and shared knowledge around public engagement and citizen-led integration and coordination in implementing plans;
  • Opportunity for participants to learn about public engagement experiences from around the world;
  • Opportunities to plan action in improving public engagement and citizen-led integration and coordination.

2. What were the core issues identified in your event as they relate to the theme and sub-themes of WUFIII?

Issues relate to theme - Social Inclusion and Cohesion and sub-theme - Public Engagement: The Inclusive Approach

  • Fostering Public Engagement and Leadership
  • Intersectoral Collaboration
  • Social Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples
  • Empowerment and Knowledge Transfer
  • International Application and Transferability

3. What were the main points raised by panellists and participants in relation to these different issues? What new ideas have been generated as a result of the discussion?

Summary points of session:

  • Community involvement in planning, decision-making, and implementation does work
  • Having a clear planning process is important
  • Collaboration of intersectoral partners is critical, particularly early in the process

4. What process steps have been identified in your event that could help turn ideas into operational reality?

Steps, according to the participants, that can be taken to improve citizen involvement in the implementation of projects:

  • Training and capacity building of citizens
  • Clear aims to objectives
  • Successful marketing and communication strategies
  • Clear about the level of involvement expected
  • Institutional mechanisms for involving different groups effectively and facilitative resources to do this
  • Organizational change to build relationships to engage citizens and the will to do so
  • Compile Stakeholder Engagement Plans
  • Legislative change that encourages engagement
  • Indicating to citizens that they are being heard and that issues will be addressed
  • Provide and stick to a implementation timeline
  • Put project funds toward community members (e.g. for note-taking services)
  • Reducing conflict of interest around land development
  • Reduce funding overlap
  • Engage citizens early in the planning process (at the beginning)

back to top